US Space Force acquisition risks have come under scrutiny following a recent Air Force review. The report warns that speed-focused development may jeopardize mission assurance and system sustainability.
Thank you for reading this post. Don't forget to subscribe!
Speed vs. Security: A Growing Tension in Space Procurement
The Space Force pursues rapid acquisition to stay ahead of global rivals like China and Russia. However, the Air Force’s analysis—led by Frank Calvelli—identifies serious risks in this “go-fast” model.
According to the review, weaknesses include poor systems integration, insufficient testing, and fragile architectural planning. These factors, if ignored, may compromise future capability.
Learning from Past Failures: Balancing Speed and Reliability
Historically, programs that prioritized speed have often failed. The review recommends a better balance between urgency and oversight. In other words, speed must not undermine reliability.
Calvelli emphasizes the need for systems engineering, lifecycle planning, and architectural cohesion. These elements ensure new technologies integrate well with existing assets.
Furthermore, the report suggests milestone-based evaluations to monitor progress. This structured approach would improve transparency and reduce acquisition risks.
The critique arrives as Space Force rapidly expands satellite constellations and engages with private sector partners. Clearly, the agency’s momentum is strong—but the review calls for caution.
Similarly, concerns about rushed procurement have emerged in hypersonic and AI-driven systems. Without adequate testing, such platforms may fail under operational pressure.
Therefore, strategic superiority requires more than speed. It demands cybersecurity, interoperability, and thorough validation. The Air Force believes success depends on striking this balance now.
External Link: Read the original Defense News article
Internal Link: US ramps up strategic satellite investments in 2025